Ta-Nehisi Coates: The Civil War Was Not a Tragedy

2 05 2011

Battle of Antietam, 1862; Confederate dead

Ta-Nehisi Coates, an African-American columnist at the Atlantic, dislikes it when people say that the American Civil War was a “tragedy”. Coates was writing in response to a recent podcast about the Civil War from the “Backstory” American history website.

Coates writes:

The conceded common ground was the following–The Civil War was a tragedy. I think that ground is generally accepted by almost everyone, and for good reasons. Six hundred thousand people died in the Civil War, a shocking figure which doesn’t really capture the toll that this sort of violence took on the country at large. And yet when I think about the Civil War I don’t feel sad at all. To be honest, I feel positively fucking giddy.

His blog post gets us thinking about qualifies as a historical tragedy. Some might dismiss this as a purely semantic issue, but I think there is actually a pretty fundamental question that needs to be asked.





Excellent Disunion Blog Post

30 03 2011

The New York Times has been “live blogging plus 150 years” the events of the American Civil War. I have been impressed by the sheer quality of many of the posts to the Disunion blog. Some really distinguished academics have contributed to it.

I loved yesterday’s blog post because it set the Civil War in its international context. It was about the Republic of San Marino’s reaction to Lincoln’s inauguration. It is a great post because it connects and compares the story of Italian unification in the 1860s with the  Civil War. The author of the post is Don H. Doyle, who teaches history at the University of South Carolina and a public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center. He is the author of “Nations Divided: America, Italy, and the Southern Question” and is writing about a book about the international context of dimensions of the American Civil War.

Check out this lecture by Doyle.