Should paper textbooks be replaced with e-books suitable for Ipad? Some historians appear to think so. Check out historian Sean Kheraj’s new blog post on the subject.
I like some aspects of this idea. A digital textbook on Ipad can include cool moving images like this:
The relevance of animated maps to the teaching of history hardly needs additional comment.
Moreover, digital textbooks _might_ be a way of reducing the costs of textbooks, which is currently way too high. However, the savings to students from going paperless might be outweighed by the costs of new technologies is everyone has to invest in Ipads or other electronic readers.
As well, I can sniff a conspiracy of textbook companies here. Textbook publishers are notorious for issuing new editions of core textbooks in quick succession in order to sabotage the development of a secondary market. This is a big problem in economics and chemistry courses. The discipline of chemistry doesn’t change that quickly, so students ideally should be able to save money by purchasing versions of the course textbook published a few years back. However, some courses are designed around the newest version of each textbook, which forces the students to buy a new book. This is planned obsolescence at its worst.
It reminds me to a General Motors in the days of Alfred P. Sloan– each year there were lots of superficial changes to the cars designed to encourage people to sell last year’s model.
In the Canadian history survey course I teach, I use a textbook called Origins : Canadian history to Confederation by R. Douglas Francis, Richard Jones, Donald B. Smith, 6th ed. (Toronto : Nelson Education, 2009). On the first day of class, I urge the students to try to buy used copies of this book, either online or from someone on campus. I also tell that it is ok if they buy the 5th edition, which came out in 2004. When I give weekly textbook readings in the course outline, I give relevant page numbers for both editions of the book. I’m certain the publishing company would prefer it if I told my students to only use the 6th edition and to buy only new copies, but I understand that they need to save cash. There isn’t a big difference between the 5th and the 6th editions.
One problem with switching over from hard-copy textbooks to books on Ipad is that it will kill off the secondary market. When I pay to download a song to my Ipod, I am buying a bundle of rights I can’t resell. Textbooks and digital rights management will allow textbook companies to do what they have always dreamed of doing– shutting down the secondary market.
The textbooks on Kindle project at Princeton flopped. Let’s keep in mind that Princeton is a rich American university, where people tend to have more money for technological experimentation than they would at a typical Canadian university.
Another potential pitfall is this– looking at a computer screen for too long is hard on the eyes. I’m told that the Ipad is different that it is less painful to look at for extended period, but until I’m convinced of this I won’t be investing in an Ipad. If I could rent an Ipad for 24 hours I might be willing to experiment with the technology, but spending $500 on something that might hurt my eyes is simply too expensive.
Whether people read digital textbooks on iPads, Kindles, Kobos, or laptops is an important question, but, as I tried to make clear in my recent post (and previous posts), I think the software for digital reading is more important to consider than the hardware.
It is at the level of software that publishers can make full use of the advantages of e-books over print books. This, of course, is not to say that I think print has no place in history (obviously it does). However, if we are going to try to incorporate digital publishing into historical scholarship, publishers should not simply try to replicate a print reading experience on a computer screen. For many readers, e-books will never be able to satisfactorily replace print. E-books should make best use of what makes the digital medium different from print. As you point out, there are some very compelling things you can do with animated maps and images that cannot be done in print.
You also make some very good points about the potential impact of digital reading on the used textbook market. I raised a similar point in a post about the Kindle and other digital reading devices that your readers might want to check out:
http://seankheraj.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/why-historians-shouldn%e2%80%99t-count-on-the-kindle-digital-reading-and-historical-scholarship/
We explore many of these emerging issues in the NiCHE Notes on Knowledge Mobilization blog here:
http://seankheraj.wordpress.com/knowmob/
Andrew, saw your post. I too thought it would be a good idea to rent an iPad…so I did. Ultimately, it led me to buy one. I had a great experience with ipadrental.com
Cheers,
Chris
Thanks for the suggestion Claire.