“George Washington” On the Claim the Fed is Apolitical

24 02 2014

George Washington is the pseudonym of a blogger over on Zerohedge. In a recent post, he correctly demolishes the oft-repeated claim that the Federal Reserve is completely apolitical. He points out that it is highly political and provides some great examples:

George Washington’s is correct. The Fed is far from apolitical. The thing is, the pattern he has observed is not unique to the United States. Every central bank is politicized, as is every existing financial and monetary system. Fiat money is itself as deeply political artefact. The politics is baked into it. Indeed, even if we could have a world without central banks, money would still be inherently political, as long as there were sovereigns capable of interfering with the issuance of currency by private banks. Indeed, there is some evidence to support the anthropologist David Graeber’s view that money was first created by sovereigns so as to control their subjects. (He makes this argument in Debt: the First 5,000 Years).
The real question is: what can we do to depoliticize money and/or ensure that the institutions that shape monetary policy are designed so as to benefit the majority of the population? Alas, George Washington doesn’t really give us any answers to these tough questions. Pointing out that the Fed is highly politicized is like shooting fish the barrel. I’m disappointed that George Washington didn’t propose, you know, actual solutions.

I’ve noticed a pattern in the blog posts by “George Washington.” He throws lots of mud, makes lots of attacks, but doesn’t ever propose concrete solutions. ZeroHedge can do better. So can George Washington.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: