Will Wilkinson on Toronto and the Immigration Fallacy

3 05 2009

Will Wilkinson, who is a fellow at the Cato Institute and one of the most effective libertarian communicators in the blogosphere, has published an article praising Toronto as an example of multiculturalism that works. The point he is making for the benefit of his largely American readership is that the fears about the corrosive effects of immigration expressed by the late Sam Huntington are completely baseless.  I think that this article is totally spot-on.





Chrysler Past and Present

2 05 2009

Today’s Globe and Mail had an excellent article summarzing the recent history of Chrysler.





Conflict and Harmony

1 05 2009

I’d like to make a quick observation on the state of Canadian-American relations. On Thursday, the Canadian and Ontario governments announced that they would be taking equity stakes in the reorganized Chrysler. This means that they will be joint owners of the company along with the United States government and the UAW. On the same day, however, the U.S. State Department added Canada to its blacklist of countries that provide insufficient respect for intellectual property. Canada is the only developed country on this list.

It is striking that the same day there can be one announcement related to transborder cooperation on one issue (rescuing Chrysler, a bankrupt twentieth-century smokestack company) and conflict on another, arguably more important question, (the intellectual property rights on which the IT and entertainment industries are based).





Invisible Hands: New Book on History of American Free-Market Ideology

1 05 2009

I’ve put another book on my must read list for this summers. It’s Kim Phillips-Fein first book, Invisible Hands: The Making of the Conservative Movement from the New Deal to Reagan. I heard Kim present part of this research at the 2005 Business History Conference and I was really intrigued. I’m looking forward to reading this book.





Joseph Heath’s Filthy Lucre

1 05 2009

Last night I watched a first-class Bloggingheads discussion between Will Wilkinson and Joseph Heath. Heath, who is a philosophy professor at University of Toronto, was discussing his new book, Filthy Lucre: Economics for People Who Hate Capitalism. What I like most about this book is that Heath exposes the economic fallacies of the right (e.g., the idea that cutting the size of the welfare state will boost economic growth) as well as those of the left. Will Wilkinson had some very interesting and counterintuitive things to say about the degree of economic freedom in Canada and Denmark (by some measures it is actually higher than in the United States).





Canadian Historical Association Meeting 2009: Observations on the Provisional Program

29 04 2009

I will be presenting at the 2009 meeting of the Canadian Historical Association (Ottawa, 25-28 May).
In reviewing the program, I’ve noticed a few interesting things.

First, the panel, “Beyond the Founders: Approaches and Methodologies for a New Political History” caught my eye. If I understand it correctly, the theme of this panel is the creation of a new approach to political history that will draw on the methodologies used in some of other branches of history, most notably social history. In other words, this panel represents an attempt to overcome the clichéd distinction between “political” and “social” history that polarized the Canadian historical profession in the 1990s.
I’m also glad to see that a fair number of military historians will be presenting at this year’s CHA. In previous years, the conference has been largely devoid of any military history content.  I’m really looking to the panel on “Defining Authority and Identity in World War I” The presenters include Tim Cook of the Canadian War Museum, Andrew Iarocci of Royal Military College,Teresa Ann Iacobelli, University of Western Ontario, and Jane McGaughey, Royal Military College.





Canada-EU Trade Pact in Works: Trudeau’s “Third Option” Rises from the Grave

29 04 2009

It appears that Canada and the European Union are ready to begin negotiating a trade pact.

My wife, who knows that I am troubled by Canada’s reliance on the export of unprocessed natural resources, asked me whether free(r) trade with the EU would be helpful in getting Canada to transition from a natural resource based to knowledge-based economy?

I replied that I didn’t think that a Canada-EU trade agreement would encourage Canada to move from natural resources to a knowledge-based economy, but it would reduce our economic dependence on the United States, which is also a very good thing.

I must say that while I heartily approve of the opening of these negotiations, I doubt whether a significant agreement will be concluded, since each of Canada’s provincial governments has a veto over the agreement, as does each EU country. There are too many people at the table to satisfy. I can see the government of Newfoundland torpedoing the agreement over the issue of seal pelt exports or something like that. For more on the seal issue, see here.

I suspect that the outcome of these negotiations will be a very modest agreement that reduces a few trade barriers but which has a minimal impact on Canada’s overall trade pattern. Those Canadians who believe that this pact will somehow lead to Canada becoming part of the Schengen area are dreaming in Technicolor. (I admit it would be nice if Canadians had the right to live and work in the EU, but this isn’t on the table).





Introduction

29 04 2009

This is the blog of Andrew Smith, a professor of history at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. To find out more about me, click here.

This is a para-academic blog that relates to my teaching and research. My aim is to create a blog that is similar in style to Dan Drezner’s blog at Foreign Policy. Drezner’s blog contains his musings on the discipline of political science, IR theory, and current events as well as updates on his scholarly activities (e.g., conference presentations). He also contains the odd post about baseball, just to keep the blog from getting too serious. Drezner makes many short posts rather than a few long ones, which encourages people to return to his blog on a regular basis. His blog is one of the most popular academic blogs out there and I’ve shamelessly decided to borrow his formula for success.

What are my research and teaching interests? I teach Canadian history. My research interests centre on political, business, and economic history in the nineteenth century. Much of my research is focused on the 1860s, the decade I regard as the most interesting period in the history of North America and the North Atlantic Triangle. My first book, which was published in 2008, was on the financial aspects of Canadian Confederation. My second book, which is currently be considered by an academic press, provides a revisionist interpretation of Confederation.  My goal for this summer is to finish my third book, which examines the lives of seven individuals whose lives illuminate Canada’s relationship to the British Empire.

What sort of posts will appear on this blog? The posts will fall into four main categories.

First, I shall provide updates on my activities (e.g., conference presentations).

Second, I will share my opinions on scholarly books and articles I am reading.

Third, I will supply hit-and-run observations current events from a Canadian historian’s perspective. If there is a historical aspect of or parallel with a story in the news, I will point it out.

Fourth, I’m going to share my opinions of movies I have seen. My main hobbies outside of work are cinema and cooking.





First Post

28 04 2009

This is the first post of Andrew Smith to his new blog.





Interesting Podcast on American Founding

28 04 2009

I’m heading to the gym right now. I will be listening a podcast of an interview  with Joseph Ellis, who will be talking about his new book on the generation of American politicians who led the Revolution