“Who Owns the Words That Come Out of Your Mouth?”

20 01 2013

Winston Churchill in 1942. Please note that this photograph was taken by an employee of the United States government is therefore in the public domain. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/owi2001045696/PP/

“Who Owns the Words That Come Out of Your Mouth?”

We listen to the Freakonomics Radio program almost every week. The show is usually entertaining and enlightening. The latest episode is unusually good. (Click here to listen)

It’s basically on the subject of copyright law and intellectual property rights more generally. The show begins with an interview with Barry Singer, the author of a recent book on Winston Churchill. Singer explains that copyright over every spoken or written statement ever made by Winston Churchill remains in the hands of his descendants. In other words, if you want to quote something Churchill said, you have to pay them a royalty. The hosts use Singer’s experience as a jumping off point for a wide-ranging discussion that covers the differences between UK and US copyright law and the question of whether intellectual property rights have become too strong and are actually impeding creativity and economic development. They interview Rohan Silva, a policy advisor to David Cameron, who fears that the UK’s excessively strong protection for intellectual property may be discouraging technological innovation. The founders of Google have said that they would have been unable to start their company in the UK because of the intellectual property laws.

Regardless of whether you are a fan of Intellectual Property or an admirer of the late Aaron Swartz, you will find this broadcast to be very interesting. Among the interesting facts presented in this podcast are:

1)      The US legal doctrine of “fair use” (which allows you to quote published statements without paying a royalty) does not exist in British law.  (In Commonwealth countries, there is the concept of “fair dealing” but it appears to be more protective of copyright holders than the US fair use doctrine).

2)      The price per word to quote Clementine Churchill is greater than that to quote her husband Winston.

3)      If a newly-minted PhD in economics publishes an article in a top economics journal, he or she can expect to raise their lifetime earnings by $100,000.  (I suspect that the figure for historians is lower, simply because in our biblio-centric discipline publishing a book is what is valued by potential employers).





Galaxy Tab 10.1, or When Patent Lawyers Attack Progress

11 08 2011

Some people argue that patents for inventors slow rather than encourage technological innovation. I’m inclined to agree with this view, but I recognize that there are some really smart people on both sides of this raging debate. For more about “patent trolls”,  see here.

Yesterday, a court in Germany decided to throw some more  fuel on the fire when it issued an injunction banning sales of Samsung’s Galaxy tablet because it is too similar to Apple’s tablet. The problem is that both devices have a rectangular screen surrounded by a black frame.

Apparently, Apple’s lawyers have somehow been able to copyright the square.  The FT has more details:

Apple’s success in delaying the sale in Europe of Samsung Electronic’s Galaxy Tab, the top competitor to its iPad, buttresses its position as the dominant tablet supplier worldwide, while shining a spotlight on the chaotic nature of intellectual property rights enforcement.

The Silicon Valley powerhouse on Tuesday won a preliminary injunction from a Dusseldorf court, barring Samsung’s sale of its Galaxy Tab 10.1 in every European Union member nation but the Netherlands.

 

The Guardian reports:

European customs officers have been ordered to seize shipments of Samsung‘s Galaxy Tab computers after Apple won a preliminary injunction against the Korean electronics giant in an acrimonious patent dispute.

Personally, I’m planning to get a trademark over the circle. That way I can sue all of the manufacturers of wheels. In fact, if I got a court order shutting down the world’s car industry, I could become an environmental hero.

Frigging absurd.

Patent Trolls Are a Big Problem