“Who Owns the Words That Come Out of Your Mouth?”

20 01 2013

Winston Churchill in 1942. Please note that this photograph was taken by an employee of the United States government is therefore in the public domain. Image courtesy of the Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/owi2001045696/PP/

“Who Owns the Words That Come Out of Your Mouth?”

We listen to the Freakonomics Radio program almost every week. The show is usually entertaining and enlightening. The latest episode is unusually good. (Click here to listen)

It’s basically on the subject of copyright law and intellectual property rights more generally. The show begins with an interview with Barry Singer, the author of a recent book on Winston Churchill. Singer explains that copyright over every spoken or written statement ever made by Winston Churchill remains in the hands of his descendants. In other words, if you want to quote something Churchill said, you have to pay them a royalty. The hosts use Singer’s experience as a jumping off point for a wide-ranging discussion that covers the differences between UK and US copyright law and the question of whether intellectual property rights have become too strong and are actually impeding creativity and economic development. They interview Rohan Silva, a policy advisor to David Cameron, who fears that the UK’s excessively strong protection for intellectual property may be discouraging technological innovation. The founders of Google have said that they would have been unable to start their company in the UK because of the intellectual property laws.

Regardless of whether you are a fan of Intellectual Property or an admirer of the late Aaron Swartz, you will find this broadcast to be very interesting. Among the interesting facts presented in this podcast are:

1)      The US legal doctrine of “fair use” (which allows you to quote published statements without paying a royalty) does not exist in British law.  (In Commonwealth countries, there is the concept of “fair dealing” but it appears to be more protective of copyright holders than the US fair use doctrine).

2)      The price per word to quote Clementine Churchill is greater than that to quote her husband Winston.

3)      If a newly-minted PhD in economics publishes an article in a top economics journal, he or she can expect to raise their lifetime earnings by $100,000.  (I suspect that the figure for historians is lower, simply because in our biblio-centric discipline publishing a book is what is valued by potential employers).

Churchill’s Other Lives

21 03 2011


For the last week, historian David Cannadine has been presenting a series of documentaries on Winston Churchill on BBC Radio 4 (which is the high-brow talk service of the BBC). The focus of the series is on Churchill’s personal life and personal quirks, such as his fondness for bricklaying.

People worldwide can listen to all of the documentaries here. Keep in mind, however, that there is a 7-day moving wall for downloads and if you want to listen to the first documentary of the series, you will need to do so within the next few hours.

Richard Toye, Churchill’s Empire

18 08 2010

The young Churchill charged through imperial atrocities, defending each in turn…  Of course, it’s easy to dismiss any criticism of these actions as anachronistic. Didn’t everybody in Britain think that way then? One of the most striking findings of Toye’s research is that they really didn’t: even at the time, Churchill was seen as standing at the most brutal and brutish end of the British imperialist spectrum.
This is from Johann Hari’s review of Richard Toye’s new book Churchill’s Empire. The main subject of the book is Churchill’s thinking about race.

It looks as if there is some interesting material for Canadian historians in this book.