Moulin à paroles

14 09 2009

Canadian newspapers have published quite a bit about Moulin à paroles, a controversial event that took place on the Plains of Abraham this past weekend. I am interested in the controversy because of what it says about the ongoing importance of the social memory of the famous 1759 battle fought there. I have made a compilation of links to news/commentary items about the event.

Les journaux canadiens ont publie beaucoup des pièces sur le « Moulin à paroles », un événement controversé qui avait lieu sur les plaines d’Abraham à Québec la fin de semaine passés. La controverse m’intéresse parce que je suis historien du Canada. J’ai fait une compilation des liens.

English-language newspapers and websites/ journaux anglophones :

CBC.ca

Canada.com

St Catherines Standard

Vancouver Sun

Journaux francophones/ French-language newspapers :

Le Devoir

Radio-Canada

Canoë

La Presse Canadienne

Cyberpresse.ca

Le Journal De Québec

Related Story :

The a group of veterans in Calgary has unveiled a statue of General James Wolfe.





Dominion Institute Shuts Its Doors

13 09 2009

The Dominion Institute, the Canadian heritage charity, is merging with the Historica Foundation. Christopher Moore discusses the reasons for the merger on his blog.





NARA Photostream

13 09 2009

The National Archives and Record Adminstration in the United States has been posting digitized historical photos to Flickr. It is now seeking input from the public about which photos it should post online next.

This is great news for history professors in the PowerPoint age.

P.S. The national archives in Canada, now known as Library and Archives Canada, has been posting digitized images from its collection to the Wikimedia Commons.





Historian Gerhard Ens in the News

13 09 2009

Fort Whoop-Up is notorious in the history of western Canada because American whiskey traders sold poisonous liquor to First Nations there. Canadian historians have traditionally regarded the presence of American whiskey traders in the Canadian west as an essentially negative force. University of Alberta historian Gerhard Ens, however, is now challenging the conventional wisdom. He shared his research with the public at a recent conference at Fort Whoop-Up, which is now a historic site. See this item from the Lethbridge Herald.





Teaching After Midnight

11 09 2009

Should universities offer classes in the middle of the night? Bunker Hill Community College in Boston appears to think so. Last night they offered their first night-time class: it started at 23:45 and ended at 02:45.  The instructor blogged about it here. Midnight classes were introduced as a way of dealing with a shortage of classroom space caused by a sudden surge in the student population. Some students prefer the late night classes because they are in shift work.

For press commentary, see here, here, and here.  To listen to an interview with the profs involved, click here.





The University Dropout Rate

10 09 2009

Yesterday’s New York Times carried a story about dropout rates at U.S. universities. David Leonhardt provides some interesting statistics regarding the proportion of students admitted to university who actually graduate. At elite universities, the vast majority of students admitted will graduate with a degree within six years. However, at universities where the admission standards are lower, the dropout rate is far higher.  Leonhardt writes that while the U.S. “does a good job enrolling teenagers in college, but only half of students who enrol end up with a bachelor’s degree. Among rich countries, only Italy is worse”. He argues that the college dropout rate is a major reason why measurably inequality in the United States has soared in the last few decades and economic growth has slowed.

This article has generated a great deal of online debate, (also see here and here and here) with some people questioning Leonhardt’s rather bold assertions that the high college dropout rate is a _major_ cause of rising inequality and slowing growth. Clearly, a high dropout rate isn’t a good thing, but is it really what’s driving these broad economic trends? I’m inclined to be a bit sceptical of this part of his argument. Leonhardt appears to be using a bit of hyperbole in the interests of bringing our attention to what is an important issue.

As a professor at a Canadian university, this article raises several questions. (I was struck by the paucity of cross-national comparison data in this article, aside from the token reference to Italy at the start. I must say that this article displays the typical United States parochialism).  Anyway, I’m left wondering whether there is similar data for Canada that would allow us to estimate the dropout rate at Canadian institutions of higher education? (There is a definitional issue here, of course, since college has a different meaning in Canada). Which Canadian universities and provinces have the highest dropout rates?

The sources cited in this article include: Failure Factories, from the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, and Crossing the Finish Line, a new book from Princeton University Press. You can watch an interview of the lead author of Crossing the Finish Line, William G. Bowen, by clicking here.

Update:

I’ve discovered some sources re the dropout rate in Canadian universities. The Maclean’s survey of Canadian universites contains data on retention rates. The Ontario Council of Universities provides information on both retention and graduation rates. In February 2008, the Ottawa Citizen carried a story about “first-year flameouts” and what universities are attempting to remedy the problem of low retention rates.





Seventieth Anniversary of Canada’s Declaration of War on Nazi Germany

10 09 2009

Several Canadian newspapers have covered this anniversary. See here, here, and here. Perhaps the best anniversary-related item to appear in the press today was J.L. Granatstein’s piece in the Globe and Mail.





Plains of Abraham

9 09 2009

The National Battlefield Commission, the federal agency responsible for the Plains of Abraham in Quebec City, has decided to allow a controversial event to proceed. The event, which has been organized by a group of Quebec nationalists, will include a reading of the FLQ 1970 manifesto. (For the benefit of non-Canadian readers, I should point out that the FLQ was a terrorist organization whose antics resulted in the imposition of martial law in Canada for a brief period in 1970).  Some critics regard the forthcoming event as glorifying terrorism. (See here as well).

I have two thoughts about the decision of the Commission to allow the event to go ahead. First, I’m struck by the tremendous symbolic importance that Canadians, particularly Quebeckers, still attach to the Plains of Abraham. Earlier this year, there was a media firestorm in both English- and French-speaking Canada over the issue of whether or not a re-enactment of the famous battle should be allowed to take place. (See here, here, and here).

Second, the decision of a federal agency to allow an event that appears to commemorate the FLQ to take place on federal property illustrates that the October Crisis has now become just another historical event. The majority of Canadians now alive were born after 1970, and the major protagonists involved in the crisis (Trudeau, Bourassa, Cross) are now dead.  Not a single member of the House of Commons that voted in favour of imposing the War Measures Act in 1970 is still in parliament. I suspect that in 1990, just twenty years after the October Crisis, it would have unthinkable for a federal agency to have allowed this event of this sort of go ahead. But memories and passions appear to have faded enough for the October Crisis to no longer be a painful memory. Indeed, for most Canadians, it is not a memory, simply something learned about in history books.





Canadian Historian in the News

7 09 2009

University of Saskatchewan historian Bill Waiser is quoted in a Canadian Press story about the recent conversion of two municipalities in Saskatchewan from town to city status. Professor Waiser discusses the growth of these communities in light of Saskatchewan’s recent strong economic performance.  Waiser remarks that “There’s a great significance to yet another city in Saskatchewan because in the national consciousness, Saskatchewan is a place that time forgot – of rural roads, country elevators, wheat fields.” Waiser points out that today’s Saskatchewan is essentially urban and has a dynamic economy.

Waiser is the author of Saskatchewan: A New History.





PetroChina and the Oil Sands

3 09 2009

The Canadian media has generated a host of stories related to PetroChina’s purchase of a large stake in the Alberta oil sands. See here, here, and here. The Calgary Herald is advocating that the federal government block the sale. The Economist has coverage here. Some of the discussion revolves around whether the federal government will allow PetroChina, a state-owned company, to complete the purchase. The existing legislation governing foreign takeovers of Canadian companies is nebulous on the subject of state-owned enterprises. Interesting, the deal has been opposed by some Americans, who object to the Chinese acquiring energy resources in America’s “backyard”. (Apparently, these people believe that the United States has some sort of prior claim on Canada’s resources).

I’m interested by the possibility that this controversy might be the beginning of a contest between two economic giants, the United States and China, for Canada’s resources. For decades, Canada has been firmly in the economic orbit of the United States. I would welcome such competition for Canada’s energy. First, from a strictly economic point of view, it is better to have multiple parties bidding for one’s assets. Second, from a political point of view, I think that it is important to have a force in Canada that can counter-balance the overwhelming influence of the United States. One of the broad lessons of Canadian history, in my opinion, is Canada is most likely to maintain its autonomy vis-à-vis its superpower neighbour by associating itself with powerful nations off the continent. In the past, the off-continent partner was the United Kingdom. In the future, it may be China.

There is more about PetroChina here.